From: erdrgregc@netscape.net
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 7:12 PM
To: gwenh@vacep.org
Cc: Ornato@aol.com; mgonzalez@mcvh-vcu.edu
Subject: Fwd: Psychiatry
 
 
Dear Gwen,
 
I sent a strong letter to key legislators who were involved in last year's review of Virginia's psychiatric processes. I have had good responses from both state Delegates & Senators. Secretary Tavenner's office is receptive but has only used the communication for informative purposes at this time. She will likely respond after the Governor decides if he will issue executive mandates. I am speaking to some Congressional members in DC next week & will forward some ideas at that level. I tried reaching Dr. Kavet to let know of the progress but I was unable to reach him. We will likely need a group of interested physicians available to speak next legislative session in January 2008. Melanie is another good person to keep updated if you have her email. A national psychiatry safety group out of DC called Psychiatric Laws has told me they will assist. John Snook is there lead contact (757-294-6007) and said he could provide supportive information & research for the proposed changes. 
 
Thanks
 
Greg C
 
 
 
Gregory Christiansen, D.O., F.A.C.O.E.P. Assistant Professor
Director of Medical Education
Department of Emergency Medicine
MCV/VCU Health Systems
West 210, P.O. Box 980401
401 N. 12th St.
Richmond, Virginia 23298-0401
804-628-4092
(H) erdrgregc@netscape.net
(W) gchrist@mail2.vcu.edu

NOTE:  The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your
computer.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: emmetthanger@aol.com
To: erdrgregc@netscape.net
Sent: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: Psychiatry

Greg, thank you again for your call today. I spoke with Senator Hanger afterwards and he does want to follow-up. He is enroute to a meeting in DC of the National Conference of State Legislators, where I am sure the VT issue will be raised due to its national media coverage. The Senator chairs a committee on NCSL and was formerly on their Executive Committee so he may even be able to get some additional details on the other state's legislation that you mentioned.
 
I will file your email with the notes I took from our phone conversation for his review. He is very busy campaigning right now for a June 12th primary for re-election, but as I indicated earlier, your call was of interest to him both professionally and personally. Thank you for all you do!
 
Holly Herman- Legislative Aide
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: erdrgregc@netscape.net
Sent: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 1:28 PM
Subject: Psychiatry

April 18, 2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dear Senator Hanger,
 
Thank you for your service & I was hoping you could help influence the legislature to bring about positive change to Virginia’s mental health delivery system. I very much appreciate the support your office has provided in addressing the emergency psychiatric services in Virginia.
 
Let me start by saying we have more then enough index cases to emphatically express the desperate condition of the Virginia State emergency mental health system. I have been frustrated in attempting to improve the Virginia system since moving to the state 7 years ago. The system simply fails both the patient & society and has resulted in severe consequences. Additionally, it is embarrassing to me to have the national media highlight the state’s deficient mental health system when there were many attempts to avert such catastrophes in prior legislative sessions. To give you recent publicized examples of problem just in the past year, Fairfax County Police Detective Vicky Armel and Officer Michael Garbarino died at the hands of a deranged person last summer. Vicky was a relative of one of our physicians. You personally have experienced the failings of the system with the loss of your family member for which I extend my condolences. The Virginia Tech murders will likely be found to stem from a similar failure in the state psychiatric system once the investigation is complete.  I personally have numerous medical cases of inadequacies in the law resulting in compromised care to the patient and imminent danger to the public. I believe the Great State of Virginia can no longer sit idle in regards to the problem. The follow article written by a Lawyer gives some perspective on the issue, http://gazette.gmu.edu/articles/8530/ .
 
The emergency psychiatric patient should be treated as any other emergency. In the state of Virginia, a patient can only be considered an emergency if deemed so by law enforcement or a community service board member. I can offer many examples of how this flawed chain of intervention is misguided. It is noteworthy to recognize health care professionals are not included in this system despite being the only truly qualified health care providers to treat & determine a psychiatric emergency. The hands of an emergency physician are tied by the law & the physician cannot emergently detain or treat a psychiatric patient until the processes of a TDO &/or ECO are implemented by the bureaucracy imposed. The bureaucratic appointees are not physicians & do not posses validated training in determining a psychiatric emergency. They also do not provide acute psychiatric care or incur any liability for their decisions. In the emergency situation they add little if any value to the emergent stabilization or determination of a psychiatric emergency. They actually delay care because the emergency health professionals have to wait sometimes hours before gaining approval to treat. The system relies on community service board & magistrates who are not in the emergency department 24 hours a day to determine an emergent psychiatric condition. Additionally, they often make determinations of a psychiatric emergency independent & contrary to the professional health care provider without ever being in the hospital to assess the patient's behavior. It is amazing to allow emergency treatment for a trauma patient who may not have capacity to make decisions, but in the case of a psychiatric patient, who clearly does not have capacity, the physician has to wait for state approval before stabilization can occur. To initiate emergency care would otherwise be considered assault under the Virginia statute. Incidentally, this statute is in direct violation to the Federal EMTALA law which mandates stabilization of emergent conditions. It is also ridiculous to have non physicians tasked with responsibility of medical need when they do not have the credentials to make such a decision. The law needs to change to reflect the emergent nature of the acutely mentally ill patient. Following stabilization then it is appropriate to review the situation, determine the level of care and consider future disposition of the patient. Only then is it appropriate to invoke the services of a community service board or magistrate.
 
The Florida Baker Act or New York’s 9.4 with the addition of Kendra’s law are good mental health law models for the State of Virginia to emulate (http://www.psychlaws.org/LegalResources/StateLaws/NewYorkstatute.htm). Additionally, Assisted Out Patient Treatment (AOT) systems are available with validation which demonstrated a significant reduction in violence associated with mental illness. Please refer to http://www.psychlaws.org/BriefingPapers/index.htm  for resource information.
 
Please feel free to contact me is if I can be of assistance.
 
 
Best Regards,
 
Greg Christiansen, D.O.
 
Gregory Christiansen, D.O., F.A.C.O.E.P. Assistant Professor
Director of Medical Education
Department of Emergency Medicine
MCV/VCU Health Systems
West 210, P.O. Box 980401
401 N. 12th St.
Richmond, Virginia 23298-0401
(H) 804-706-6463
(W) 804-828-4860

(H) erdrgregc@netscape.net
(W) gchrist@mail2.vcu.edu

NOTE:  The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your
computer.

Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection.